Rarely does an investment opportunity like nuclear power come along.
It's cheap, it's clean, and it's all the rage.
Not every country is blessed with massive reserves of natural gas and coal, but the ones that are, in light of climate change and life-threatening pollution, are rethinking that model.
Carbon emissions are no longer en vogue. They pose a serious risk to our health and our environment.
The problem is that green energy sources — such as solar, wind, and hydropower — aren't capable of carrying the load on their own. They're too expensive, and they simply don't have enough juice to power the planet.
Nuclear power is necessary. It's cheaper than alternative fuel sources, and it emits no carbon.
In that capacity, nuclear energy is actually good for the environment. I know it sounds crazy, but it's true.
Nuclear power has avoided the release of an estimated 56 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide since 1971. That's almost two years of total global emissions at current rates.
It's also one of the cheapest forms of energy out there:
It's not quite as cheap as natural gas, but it's far more efficient than solar, wind, and even coal in terms of levelized cost.
And that's why so many countries, including the U.S., continue to rely on nuclear power.
In all, more than a dozen countries get over 25% of their energy from nuclear power, with 437 nuclear reactors operating around the world. On top of that, there are another 71 reactors under construction, 165 planned, and 315 proposed.
China is the biggest driver by far.
It already has 36 reactors in operation, another 20 under construction, and more than 100 planned.
China is going to build 40 nuclear power plants over the next five years. It will have 58 gigawatts (GW) of capacity in full commercial operation by the end of 2020, up from 30.7 GW now.
When it's all said and done, Beijing will have spent a whopping $2.4 trillion to expand its nuclear power generation by 6,600%:
But China is hardly an isolated case.
India is in a similar situation. It's pledged to grow its nuclear power capacity from 5,000 megawatts (MW) to 63,000 MW by 2030.
Russia aims to boost the share of electricity it gets from nuclear power to 25% in that time, up from 16% now.
Even Japan is restarting reactors.
In all, 15 Japanese nuclear plants housing 25 reactors have applied for permission to resume operations. Five reactors have already been cleared.
As for the U.S., nuclear energy provides 63% — nearly two-thirds — of the country's carbon-free electricity. This is shocking when you consider that nuclear power accounted for just 1% of the nation's electricity when Congress passed the Clean Air Act in 1970.
And guess what? That share is forecast to grow even further over the next decade.
In fact, Congress recently passed a $1.8 trillion Omnibus Appropriations Act. And tucked into that bill was $1 billion of funding for nuclear energy programs. That's a billion dollars earmarked for the development of new advanced reactors.
President Donald Trump has proven to be a strong supporter of nuclear power, as well.
Before he even took the oath of office, Trump sent a secret memo to the Department of Energy (DOE), asking how it could keep nuclear reactors “operating as part of the nation’s infrastructure” and what it could do to prevent nuclear plants from shutting down.
It asked the agency if the administration could resume the licensing proceedings for Yucca Mountain — a proposed nuclear waste site that was shelved by the Obama administration.
The memo asked about funding for both nuclear fusion projects and the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM). And it offered to support permitting small modular reactors, which are seen as the next generation of nuclear technology.
Nuclear power isn’t something that Trump talks much about publicly, but he does talk about it.
Back in 2011, in the wake of Japan’s Fukushima disaster, he had this to say to Fox News: “Nuclear is a way that we get what we have to get, which is energy... I’m in favor of nuclear energy, very strongly in favor of nuclear energy.”
So, going forward, you should expect a lot more action from the Trump administration in expanding the U.S. nuclear weapons and energy programs.
This is good news for the environment and nuclear power companies. But it's amazing news for uranium prices.
The Coming Uranium Rush
This nuclear renaissance, predictably, has led to a sharp rise in uranium demand.
Uranium need for supplying growing global nuclear-generating capacity is seen at 80,383 tonnes in 2020, rising to 90,780 tonnes in 2025, and 106,301 tonnes in 2030. However, estimated total production of uranium is seen at 75,000 tonnes by 2020 and around 85,000 in 2025. That's obviously short of what's needed.
As a recent Morningstar report noted:
We expect global uranium demand to rise roughly 40% by 2025, a staggering amount for a commodity that saw next to zero demand growth in the past 10 years...
The mined supply of uranium will struggle to keep pace amid rising demand and falling secondary supplies. Low uranium prices since Fukushima have left the project cupboard bare, and we expect a cumulative supply deficit to emerge by 2023. These shortfalls should begin to affect price negotiations in 2019, since utilities tend to secure supplies three to four years prior to actual use. We estimate contract market prices must rise to $65 per pound to encourage enough new supply.
The note also touched another pressing problem, namely: “Low uranium prices since Fukushima have left the project cupboard bare.”
No doubt, the five-year bear market in uranium prices has been devastating for producers.
Prices slid from $52 per pound to just $28.25 in June 2014. Today, it's even lower, trading below $25 per pound.
As a result, uranium mining has become unprofitable, leading to mine closures and even bankruptcies.
Several years ago, there were 500 companies mining uranium. Today, there are just 20.
That's right: The uranium crash has removed 96% of suppliers from the market.
Now, 80% of the world's primary uranium supply comes from just 10 mines. And future global supply is dependent on just five newly proposed projects. It's also worth noting that it could take up to 20 years to go from discovery to uranium extraction. Opening a new uranium mine is not a simple or fast process. It takes a lot of time and effort.
That hasn't been a problem up until this point because the world had adequate reserves to cover for declining production. But 2016 marked a huge inflection point for the industry. It was the first year that demand actually exceeded supplies. Going forward, such deficits will grow more frequent and more pronounced.
For that reason, uranium prices will rise over the next 10 years. They'll almost certainly double from their current level, rising above $50 per pound, which is the standard cost of production.
Some forecast models are even suggesting a price of $70 or $80.
So, how could you play it?
Well, two major uranium plays worthy of consideration are:
Cameco Corporation (NYSE: CCJ): Cameco is the world's largest uranium producer. The company explores, mines, mills, buys, and sells uranium concentrate. It has working properties at McArthur River, Key Lake, Cigar Lake, and Rabbit Lake, located in Saskatchewan, Canada. It also has the Crow Butte property located in Nebraska and the Smith Ranch-Highland located in Wyoming. Its Inkai uranium deposit is located in Kazakhstan. Cameco also operates four nuclear reactors.
Areva SA (OTC: ARVCY): Areva is a multinational conglomerate, headquartered in Courbevoie, Paris. The company offers technological solutions for nuclear power generation and also electricity transmission and distribution. It also manufactures nuclear measurement equipment and transportation safety systems, along with recycling and reprocessing nuclear fuel.
Additionally, while many of the smaller miners have been wiped out, there are still some floating around. They would be considered high-risk, high-reward investments. Two of these are Paladin Energy and Berkeley Resources:
Paladin Energy Ltd (OTC: PALAF): Paladin Energy is an Australia-based producer. It operates mines in Canada, Namibia, South Africa, and Australia.
Berkeley Energia Limited (OTC: BKLRF): Berkeley Energia is a microcap that's too small to be considered anything other than a possible buyout candidate.
Besides miners and service companies, investors could also profit from the nuclear industry by buying simple exchange-traded funds or mutual funds. These can track baskets of uranium companies, nuclear energy companies, or both.
Global X Uranium ETF (NYSE: URA): URA is designed to track the price movements in shares of companies that are active in the uranium-mining industry. The fund holds uranium stocks from all around the world, including Cameco, which accounts for one-fifth of its assets.
VanEck Vectors Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NYSE: NLR): NLR seeks to replicate the price and yield performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. To be included, companies must have a market cap exceeding $150 million, a daily average trading volume of at least $1 million, and a monthly trading volume of 250,000 shares. It also has $76 million in assets.
Holding a combination of these plays as new nuclear plants come online, the effects of reduced supply become apparent, and as uranium prices start to rise is a sound way to deploy a uranium investment strategy.
— The Outsider Club Research Team