I Told You Not to Trust Elon Musk!

Written by Jason Simpkins
Posted February 14, 2020

Just last week, I told you.

“Let’s not also forget that it wasn't that long ago that Elon Musk was smoking weed on a podcast, looking absolutely off his rocker, and being investigated by the SEC,” I wrote.

Well, if it wasn't clear then, it is now.

Despite its recent surge, Tesla is the same old Tesla and Elon Musk is the same old Elon Musk.

Yes, just two short week's ago, Musk assured investors that his company had no need for additional capital.

“It doesn’t make sense to raise money because we expect to generate cash despite this growth level,” Musk said on Tesla's fourth-quarter earnings call on January 29.

Well, this week, we learned that was a lie — or at least, to put it generously, a change of heart.

Tesla announced plans to issue more than 2.65 million common shares to raise over $2 billion in capital — an abrupt about-face that immediately eroded shareholder value.

It signals something else, too, which is that Tesla still needs capital. It needs to spend, spend, spend, which means its first-ever annual profit could prove to be more of a blip than the new normal investors anticipate.

Just one hour before the announcement, Tesla forecast as much as $3.5 billion in capital expenditures this year. That would be a 164% increase over last year’s spending, which was pruned to save cash.

Tesla Cash Spend

The $1.33 billion spent last year was well below its initial plan for as much as $2.5 billion. And that’s not sufficient to maintain Tesla’s lofty growth projections.

No, Tesla has a great number of expenses ahead of it.

It’s promised to build and start vehicle production at a factory near Berlin by the end of 2021.

It’s still building out its factory in Shanghai and supply chains in China.

And it’s also promised a “feature-complete” self-driving car, cheaper/more efficient batteries, an all-electric semi-truck, a next-generation Roadster, and the Cybertruck (the one with “unbreakable” windows) further down the line.

Tesla will also need money to hire more sales and service staff to gin up overseas sales, and to refresh its starving R&D apparatus.

“The company’s $1.3 billion in capex in 2019 fell short of the $2.5 billion guidance and a step up is needed to fund the roster of announced projects that have no facilities to house the production or target dates for launch,” said Kevin Tynan, senior autos analyst at Bloomberg.

The obvious need to boost spending could easily lead to “surprise” losses that much of Wall Street expects to be profitable going forward.

That, more than the share dilution that comes with share offerings like these, threatens to burn investors who go chasing after Tesla’s soaring shares.

And what’s more is that many analysts, including our own Jimmy Mengel, believe advancements in other alternative energy sources could put Tesla even further back on its heels.

“Blue gas,” for example, could easily displace the standard electric car.

It’s cheaper, cleaner, and more efficient than the lithium batteries that Tesla and others rely on.

It doesn’t need costly input materials like lithium or rare earth metals, because it’s derived from the world’s most abundant element. It takes just minutes to charge, rather than hours. And unlike batteries, blue gas doesn’t degrade with each charging cycle.

Given all of that, Tesla is better avoided these days.

Because so far, neither the company nor Musk himself has proven especially reliable.

Fight on,

Jason Simpkins Signature

Jason Simpkins

follow basic@OCSimpkins on Twitter

Jason Simpkins is Assistant Managing Editor of the Outsider Club and Investment Director of The Wealth Warrior, a financial advisory focused on security companies and defense contractors. For more on Jason, check out his editor's page. 

*Follow Outsider Club on Facebook and Twitter.

Investing in Marijuana Without Getting Burned